Vol. 26 · 1951 edition
Conflicts Clarify
A starting point
Palmer explores distinctions between deliberate thought and the bodily activity he attributes to Innate Intelligence. Everyday examples become a way to examine his reasoning about the relationship between the educated and Innate aspects of life.
Palmer contrasts activities a person deliberately chooses, such as moving an arm, with processes such as digestion that proceed without conscious direction. He also uses the relationship between a design and its material realization to explore the difference between an ideal and its imperfect expression.
The title suggests a way to read: follow a contrast until the distinction becomes clearer. Ask how Palmer uses each example to explain educated and Innate intelligence, and where the analogy carries the argument. The everyday illustrations make this a useful companion to the collection’s more abstract philosophical writing.
Original overview · AI-assisted editorial interpretation
A question to take with you
How does Palmer use voluntary and involuntary activity to explain Innate and educated intelligence?
Explore this question with a cited answer, or bring your own interpretation to the book’s Roundtable room.
Explore with Ask B.J.Your question will be filled in for you to review. Ask B.J.’s existing account and daily question limits apply.
Bring it to the Roundtable
Which passage helps explain this book’s central idea? What would you ask another reader? Include a book and page reference when sharing an interpretation.
Visit this book’s discussion room